Case study

A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed

Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage

A transfer line's flow signature drifted, the alert fired, and the diaphragm was replaced on a schedule instead of during a shutdown.

Carlsberg Canada

Named with the client’s agreement; every figure prints its source.

Five people at the Region of Waterloo presentation, the Carlsberg award plaque held in the centre

How it went.

Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.

  1. 01

    Alert

    Diaphragm pumps degrade before they fail, and the degradation is invisible to the naked eye.

  2. 02

    Cost

    Scheduled replacement. The pump was changed on a planned stop, with no production impact.

  3. 03

    Fix

    Flow monitoring on the transfer line · Baseline and flow-signature tracking in the dashboard · SMS and email alerting on drift off baseline

  4. 04

    Restored

    A scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

In full.

The problem

“Diaphragm pumps don’t fail all at once. They degrade. And when they degrade, the flow signature changes — subtle, gradual, invisible to the naked eye. But not to a sensor.”

What we installed

Flow monitoring on the transfer line, with the baseline and the flow signature tracked continuously in the dashboard, and alerting the moment the trace moved off baseline.

What the data showed

“We saw the pattern change on a Carlsberg transfer line. Flagged it. Maintenance found the diaphragm failing — not failed, failing. They replaced it. Scheduled. Orderly. No production impact.”

What it buys you

“This is what monitoring buys you. Not the repair — the timing.”

A pump that fails in the middle of a run takes the run with it. The same pump, changed on a planned stop three weeks earlier, costs a diaphragm and an hour. Nothing about the repair changed. Only when it happened.

What the data looked like.

Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.

A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
ESTABLISHED PEAKSignature off baselineThe transfer line has left its normal strokeNormal strokePeak down, floor up
TRANSFER LINE FLOW · ONE DAY · 30-MIN BUCKETS · DASHED = ESTABLISHED PEAK
Chart data
IntervalTransfer line (L/min)
00:0012
00:30117
01:00119
01:3011
02:0011
02:30118
03:00118
03:3012
04:0013
04:30120
05:00116
05:3014
06:0013
06:30115
07:00114
07:3012
08:0015
08:30112
09:00110
09:3016
10:0018
10:30107
11:00107
11:3018
12:0018
12:30104
13:00104
13:3019
14:0019
14:30100
15:0098
15:3021
16:0021
16:3096
17:0095
17:3025
18:0024
18:3091
19:0090
19:3027
20:0028
20:3088
21:0085
21:3028
22:0029
22:3084
23:0083
23:3030
Before and after, in words
BeforeA flow signature drifting, unnoticed, toward a shutdown
AfterA scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

The published totals are the figures in the proof register, with their sources. The interval shape is a representative reconstruction and is flagged as such in the dataset.

What changed.

Before

A flow signature drifting, unnoticed, toward a shutdown

After

A scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

Scheduled

replacement

The pump was changed on a planned stop, with no production impact.

Source: Quantify Environmental monitoring record, reviewed with Carlsberg Canada

Find out what’s hiding in your factory.

Every study on this site started with somebody walking a floor and asking what the numbers actually were. Our team will do the same on yours and tell you honestly what we find.

Book a site visitAll case studies

or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)